The protocol fee is included in that amount. The rest splits to first collector, apps that host the mint, referrals, etc.
Thank you! My wife and I did most of it ourselves. We hired drywallers since they’re just so much faster/better than I could ever hope to be and not that expensive. My brother is a blacksmith, so we used him for bits and pieces throughout.
Not unilaterally. I get why it should be a metric to consider but doing so as a rule ignores the fact that we can’t know the socioeconomic context of the person selling.
The end result is the same: rich accounts accumulate all the tokens. But in one version genuine humans are making personal/contextual decisions while in the other preferred candidates are selected by algorithm.
That’s a fair point - no, true removal of an internet native digital asset is probably not possible.
This might be a pivot, but is it provably true that lens doesn’t maintain possession over my content? The original argument “Lens is the last place you’ll ever need to build your social graph” falls a little flat considering I seem to recall the contract burning all my followers and issuing new ones at the moment we upgraded to v2.
I’ll reply here since that other post won’t let me :)
Part of owning the car is also being able to destroy the car or add racing stripes or a fluffy, pink steering wheel. If you can’t remove your content or change it, do you actually own it?
Conceivably, someone who wanted ultimate control could host their own posts on their own server. Like Phaver, but under your individual control.