Not unilaterally. I get why it should be a metric to consider but doing so as a rule ignores the fact that we can’t know the socioeconomic context of the person selling.

The end result is the same: rich accounts accumulate all the tokens. But in one version genuine humans are making personal/contextual decisions while in the other preferred candidates are selected by algorithm.

Good...

I think it makes sense. Loyal users of projects usually keep at least half of the token for a while. If someone sells all the tokens of most of projects, he is def haunting and low value user

This is a novel approach for projects but it's quite controversial because airdrop usage is subject to the whims of the receiver. But there are a few questions. How do you recognize a sell order on a wallet? not everyone trade airdrops on dexes. They can transfer to exchanges which are also wallets, how do you distinguish exchange transfers from wallet to wallet transfers?

))

probably u right,yes

i think about it after zkSync drop

sounds not too bad. as long as selling is concerned, not transferring to another wallet.