Think it rather a tactic to boost engagement, like saying "drop your handle in the comments" on Twitter. It’s just a technique to increase DAU, but nothing actually happens.
Yes, I toyally get this. The current situation is that creators'post with much less consumers. People naturally label things, so if an app says it's "for creators", then creators come, but there's no benefits for consumers which account for 90% of the users. Expecting creators bring their users is a wrong idea, a hard truth is that only creators with few fans will come to Lens, ask those famous artists who stay in Foundation/rarible... why would they left their circle and come to Lens? So the issue lies in a directional mistake. For a strong platform like FC, creators bring audience. For a developing platform like Lens, consumers/general users should be placed ahead of creators.
What's the result Potential? I didn't see any news on this "Tomorrow" thing
Well, I am somewhat concerned that the Bonsai team is distributing singe, large, unlocked airdrops to some protocols without sufficient funds to support the Bonsai token’s price. It seems like that making Lens team buying Bonsai is an attempt to make the Lens treasury cover the cost of these large airdrops by the Bonsai team. However, I hope that Bonsai will not recklessly distribute their tokens in large amounts to numerous apps.