Gm ☄️I had a chance to visit Antelope Canyon in Arizona and want to share few pictures with you. Few fun facts about this unique place:
-
Slot Canyon: Antelope Canyon is a narrow slot canyon with dramatic walls, shaped by water erosion over millions of years.
-
Two Sections: It has two parts—Upper Antelope Canyon ("The Crack") and Lower Antelope Canyon ("The Corkscrew"), each offering a different experience.
-
Flash Floods Shaped It: The smooth curves were carved by flash floods, which still happen today, adding to its unique formation.
-
Spectacular Light Beams: In summer, sunlight shines into the canyon, creating breathtaking light beams that photographers love.
-
Navajo Connection: The canyon sits on Navajo land and is called "Tse' bighanilini," meaning "the place where water runs through rocks."
Antelope Canyon is a must-see for nature lovers and photographers alike! 🌅📸 btw it has great acoustics, just listen to my video here 🎶 Xx
Think it rather a tactic to boost engagement, like saying "drop your handle in the comments" on Twitter. It’s just a technique to increase DAU, but nothing actually happens.
Yes, I toyally get this. The current situation is that creators'post with much less consumers. People naturally label things, so if an app says it's "for creators", then creators come, but there's no benefits for consumers which account for 90% of the users. Expecting creators bring their users is a wrong idea, a hard truth is that only creators with few fans will come to Lens, ask those famous artists who stay in Foundation/rarible... why would they left their circle and come to Lens? So the issue lies in a directional mistake. For a strong platform like FC, creators bring audience. For a developing platform like Lens, consumers/general users should be placed ahead of creators.
What's the result Potential? I didn't see any news on this "Tomorrow" thing
For real, Bonsai team said the 2nd airdrop will be much larger than the first one. Like from 10% to 25%. But now they've acquired funds, and that 25% turns to 10% because of the shares of investors.
Given that reason, I think there's no need for Lens team to buy $Bonsai with their treasury. The Bonsai team should be responsible for every airdrop they make and use their VC-Backed funds instead of relying on Lens treasury.
Well, I am somewhat concerned that the Bonsai team is distributing singe, large, unlocked airdrops to some protocols without sufficient funds to support the Bonsai token’s price. It seems like that making Lens team buying Bonsai is an attempt to make the Lens treasury cover the cost of these large airdrops by the Bonsai team. However, I hope that Bonsai will not recklessly distribute their tokens in large amounts to numerous apps.