the real win of rwa on-chain is not bringing already existing speculation assets but creating a new economy through collateralizing future receivables.
in my opinion, play to earn mechanism is incoherent. I've been playing games since idk when and when I play that is only about joy, anger, or self-fulfillment. I've never played a game for financial benefit. Are there financial benefits because of playing games? Yes! There are collectibles, streaming, and marketplaces for those collectibles. GameFi should be about encouraging streamers to move to decentralized streaming platforms and creating marketplaces for collectibles, not trying to create an income system in the game. Also, creating a sound and original game takes years, not months for VC satisfaction.
#KairaTopic: 1 oy kemal'e 1 oy tip'e
saygıdeğer yurttaşlarım hepinizi gönülden selamlıyorum.
14 mayısta karanlığı tarihe gömeceğimiz seçimde türkiye'nin iki blok arasında kalmış ve bu bloklarda temsil edildiğini düşünmeyen bütün yurttaşlara yeni bir siyaset anlayışı sunmak isteyen türkiye işçi partisi'nin ve türkiye işçi sınıfının 58 yıl sonra tekrardan mecliste temsil edilme ihtimali bulunmaktadır.
seçime kadarki süreçte türkiye işçi partisi ve yürütecekleri siyaset ile alakalı sorusu olan, tip'e oy vermek isteyen ama çekinen ve gönül bağını yoldaşlık bağına dönüştürmek isteyen herkesin sorularını veya çekincelerini bu başlık altında dilim döndüğünde cevaplamaya çalışacağım.
türkiye'nin ikinci yüzyılında gençlerin, kadınların, işçilerin, tüm yurttaşların daha özgürlükçü bir dünyada yaşayabilmesi için 1 oy kemal'e 1 oy tip'e!
#seçim
bald man chain is good for mainstream adoption for defi but in the long run, it will invite more regulatory bodies. the vibes are similar to the institutional entering crypto via VCs and we know how did that turn out right?
Modular blockchains are inevitable.
So what exactly do they do? 🧵
Blockchains do three things:
Data availability: Blockchain is one of the examples of Distributed Ledger Technology. The ledger contains the State Transitions, user datas etc. Data from the Network must be accessible anytime or to whoever requires it. Data availability is essential for network security.
Scalability of Data Availability can be considered as a "cost of validating the Data is Available". Reduced cost means your chain is more scalable in terms of data availability.
Several solutions are being implemented by various projects. For example, Celestia and Danksharding.
And The Execution: Additionally, the blockchain stack's execution component handles computations. All compute progress must be Turing Complete, Decentralized, and Trustless in a decentralized world.
Scalling the Execution can be considered as "the computation power that same computer handle, ie: Multi Thread computation and other stuffs"
any projects that are working for scaling Execution.
@EclipseFND, @fuellabs_ , @StarkWareLtd, @arbitrum @Scroll_ZKP @sovereign_labs
We give in when we try to scale the network by combining the three jobs. Monolithic Chains have no ability to scale. BSC is running with the 41 validator, and fees on Ethereum is still a major issue.The higher throughput, increasing the verification cost in the Monolith blockchains.
Verifications should be accessible from every single user.
We realized that we would never be able to complete these 3 things together.
In this case, a new approach and a new paradigm are offered by modular blockchains.
They essentially fragment blockchains to increase scalability for a "trust minimized world."
Modularism also effectively kills maximalism because it requires blockchain interoperability. This sums up my thoughts on why I'm so enthusiastic about modular blockchains.
1/10 supply
3wmatic
%5 mirror fee