LENNY LFG TO THE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON💪
I just voted "yes" on "Wind down MAI Pools" snapshot.org/#/stgdao.eth/proposal/0x6c9437b45e8a88978bca68238048fca8c670ed356fa7d4ae9ab9e7e93788c538 #Snapshot
We are inclined to believe that the main method of dropping out wallets will be he whose activity (including the identification of clusters of wallets), and passports will be used as a multiplier when distributing the drop.
Not many LayerZero, zkSync and Base users have passports. Such a large gap in the number began to push project teams to use passports in their activities.
Verification passports were created to screen out dishonest users participating in activities from multiple wallets. Each of the passports has its own method of obtaining, and most often passports from Bitcoin and Galaxy are used in activities.
27.08
- StarkNet. Somewhere I have deposited $ETH for activity, somewhere I continue to twist. I deposited different amounts to new wallets, at different times and through different bridges (Starkgate, Orbiter, LayerSwap). For the initial (and, in fact, the only) activities, a guide from the Calendar is suitable.
It just so happened that I have exclusively negative thoughts about Starknet: I kept a node for 8 months in the hope of a reward, but I didn't wait. After the publication, where the team + investors own 49.9% of the tokens, I realized that they are some kind of muddy types. There are two wallets in the ecosystem, the seed phrases from which cannot be imported into each other. Most likely, these are architectural features, but it still doesn't smell like $300 million of investment.