1. Eliminate the sybils

2. Take Sybil's allocation and distribute to the most active high quality user who are most likely to continue using the protocol/app

3. Farmers - cap max no. of wallets for them like between 3-6 is a fair number imo or whatever project heads decide

4. Rest of the allocations of farmers, redistribute it again to high quality real users

Idk why most protocols fuck this up so bad, either I see them giving away majority of the airdrop % to industry level Sybils (10s of thousands of wallets) and multi-account farmers (in tens/hundreds/thousands of wallets) And/or Doing the Sybil filtering so terribly that it affects most of the real users and fuck up the community sentiments

In both the cases after listing, tokens get jeeted of by Sybils and in the latter case by the real users as they lose their trust in the project due to terrible airdrop. And as a result the protocol/dapp cannot retain high majority of their users after the drop.

This is what our team at Kytelabs is invested in, building a protocol in the intersection of growth, incentives and Sybil/bot mitigation.

Super excited to soon announce what we have been experimenting since the last 2 years.