I felt it's fantastic for me to use gpt-3 to polish my resume or write me some introduction of DeLetter.
I want to take it further. Can gpt-3 really 'replace humans'?
What I want to do is to have gpt-3 generated food reviews/blogs for me, so I can have tons of food views in a short time.
But the result isn't so good. Gpt-3 did a great job in writing, however, the words are too general and the reviews it generated are too similar ( for the same dish). Gpt-3 is a better writer than me but the gap between ai and a real editor still exists.
Some thoughts of gpt-3:

• It does a great job when it comes to polishing or editing ( can't generate with nothing, even if using some prompt engineering skills)
• Please check the correction of its answers twice. It always recommend close down restaurants to me.
• It's a great and valuable product, especially for me who's bad at writing, but still needs time to grow.

I'd be willing to see how it would reshape the future and I'll experiment with ai from time to time. Experiments with #AI leads me to thinking what qualities a human should have. I think it's the ability of discrimination. What do you think?
(Attached the results of one food review and one food blog for Margherita Pizza generated by gpt-3)