Stani@stani·May 26

Have you ever participated in DAO governance? What works well? Where do you see friction?

  • sangvin@sangvin·May 28

    Yep. Stargate, AAVE, Balancer, Sperax, GMX, Dope Wars, @luchadores.lens, @uniswap.lens

    But it all seems pointless and useless to me. There are not enough tools to monitor the implementation of decisions made.

    6
    • huugo@huugo·May 28

      If it’s just a loose association of holders I’ve found it to be pretty useless, and possibly worse because it’s confusing to people. I think to work well there needs to be a lot of thought and support work put into how things get proposed and more importantly, executed. There needs to be a system to direct the DAO while allowing it to make its own decisions.

      3
      • When they’re small and need to be lightweight getting the balance wrong between formal and informal voting creates lots of friction I’ve found.

        4
        • Monster@rezback·May 27

          voting doesn't make any changes unless you are a whale so normal people don't really bother to vote although delegating the voting power to someone who makes good decisions is a good option which i think most of users are not aware of. in my opinion voting power weight should not be only dependent on how much token voter has , it can depened on more parameters like history of on chain activity of that address on all EVM chains , contribution of that address on different DAOs , age of his or her governor tokens

          0
          • king8@king8·May 27

            participated in daos but i feel a true dao governance is just an utopia.

            0
            • Mr.T@0xethmaxi·May 27

              Yes active only in Aave Gov

              0
              • If you really care, you can make some arguments and have impact on final outcome. But even in this situation you usually end up outvoted by whales who doesn't care about anything beside their direct interest

                32
                • Monem.eth@monem·May 26

                  you need to be a whale to make affect otherwise its useless

                  4
                  • Yakuza@iamtheyakuza·May 26

                    @w3adao.lens

                    Structure well designed. Token rewards based upon roles and contribution within the DAO

                    Gnosis safe worked well but at the beginning we were 10 co-founders and had to get approvals from at least 6 or 8 to sign off transactions and was not easy.

                    Getting approvals for simple things such as a tweet was also a pain… then we cut that shit off

                    0
                    • Mikzir@mikzir·May 26

                      Yes, and it is often very different from project to project. Some DAO governance works really well, some just mimic working decentralization. It is a very complex question to answer about possible friction points in a short lenster answer.

                      2
                      • Slow decision making, harder to move quickly and pivot towards a common goal

                        5
                        • @02071·May 26

                          cool

                          0