quadratic, 1/2(1token 1 vote) +1/2(quadratic), etc

Instead of 1 token 1 vote, governance models can take into account of onchain activities and DID

Ok

The counts of independent address should also be considered as one person, can gather these person to add more votes rights and conflict Fund's one address votes rights

1 token 1 vote is good

This is one year old, but might help: mirror.xyz/joaxap.eth/SBlRa5cehZx8ETMsTrbFpwRZ42zZaaxABsL5XSYJFn4

1 person 1 vote, with quadratic delegations allow, this for non profits governance. Where profit is made I think the model 1 token 1 vote still protects the ones who invested most

Who got the correct answer

i also wanna know)

what does community push for?

Quadratic voting does neuter whales a bit. Probably best current option besides no gov

Weighted clustering might be a good trade off between 1 token 1 vote and 1 wallet 1 vote. I don’t know if weighted clustering is a legitimate term in web3 or if anyone used that principle in governance voting.

With weighted clustering we would want to optimize number of clusters(n) that are going to be used and range of token holdings that will define a specific cluster.

something cooking on #lens 😄

does not have answerr (🙁🙂)

Sometimes, no governance

Nft vote model.

maybe

Nft vote model...you have the nft you can vote