“The ‘Sentencing’ for not having done anything wrong will be, conveniently for the Fascists, 4 days before the Republican National Convention,” Trump wrote. “A Radical Left Soros backed D.A., who ran on a platform of ‘I will get Trump,’ reporting to an ‘Acting’ Local Judge, appointed by the Democrats, who is HIGHLY CONFLICTED, will make a decision which will determine the future of our Nation?”
Judging a low-quality account is a very, very, very stupid behavior. A social platform cannot speak freely, so why should I use Lens? Wouldn't it be better for me to just tweet? Regarding your behavior, I now propose a modification suggestion. My plan is that all Lens users need to pay GAS, and the post has a certain number of likes, reposts and collected posts, and the official GAS subsidy will be returned.
No matter what social platform is, it will be filled with a lot of low-quality content, which is impossible to avoid. All users need GAS to reflect the fairness of all users. GAS subsidies can motivate users to post high-quality content (even if they brush is barely high quality, after all, someone is willing to pay for his post content)
waited at the front of the line
Tennessee lawmakers’ expulsion