This already possible, actually. You can purchase a profile and handle for someone in a single transaction without them taking any action. Would the idea be that they already have an address to send it to, or you're looking for a way for a user to redeem with just a code or email address?
I still don't really understand. I'd have to look into it more because it's still not immediately clear to me what the value proposition is, or how it works. I skimmed this article but it didn't really click: <zora.co/writings/onchain-secondary-markets>. I just don't have enough interest to look deeply into it.
I don't think being able to wrap an NFT to be tradable on Uniswap is particularly interesting. I don't see how it's any different from using a protocol like Seaport. Unless I'm missing something...
I hear you on diversifying. I just can't find interest in Farcaster where you rent (not own) your social graph from a federated network that barely works. Zora is too narrow in scope to capture my attention, being focused only on visual art. If you come across any succinct videos that explain why any of this is interesting please do share.
I don't really understand what he's talking about; they didn't invent ERC1155 (around since 2018) and they're not onchain profiles. Perhaps Zora is using the existing 1155 standard for their onchain profiles, but I don't see how that's inventing anything. Lens uses ERC721 for onchain profiles... but they didn't invent 721.
"Any token in the profile can be wrapped and unwrapped into a deterministic ERC20" -- what does this mean? How is it used, and what for?
I don't know anything about Zora or what they're doing so I may be lacking some context here. Just seems like yet-another protocol reinventing the social graph so they have full control; not offering anything truly unique compared to Lens. Can you help me understand why this is interesting or what it means?
Seaport is the open protocol that OpenSea runs on: <docs.opensea.io/docs/seaport>
So, similar to Seaport but for Zora Network, cool.
It has existed for a while, actually, but as far as I know, only @ornaart supports "Pay what you want" collects currently. Wouldn't be a lot of work for other apps to support it, though!
90% of my Spotify listening is actively choosing an album and listening to it in full. Other 10% is finding new albums in Discover Weekly. I never use custom playlists or shuffle and disable the autoplay feature (where it plays what it wants after the album ends).
This is how most of my friends, millennials who are "really into music", use Spotify. I suspect we're in the minority, though.
They don't but I agree that would be a valuable addition to them! You could propose that as a LIP. If not familiar with Pull Requests you can start a discussion instead: