The cognitive level determines our behavior. What kind of cognitive level is the real level? I have been thinking about this question recently, and abstraction ability is a very important measure of cognitive level. We abstract useful thinking models, and then automatically call these useful thinking models for analysis and interpretation when encountering different situations. I think this is a high latitude way of thinking.
认知水平决定了我们的行为，什么样的认知水平才是真正有水平的？我最近一直在思考这个问题，抽象能力是认知水平的很重要的衡量标准。我们把有用的思维模型进行抽象，然后在遇到不同情况的时候自动调用这些有用的思维模型进行分析解读。我想这是一种高纬的思维方式。
AI时代肯定已经到来了，每一次科技革命都带来了巨大的泡沫，带来了大量毁灭资本的投资机会，带来了极少量的超级投资机会。作为用户，我们应该感到激动，作为投资者应该冷眼旁观，不要着急下注。因为我们下注的那个标的很可能活不到下一个周期。
For web3 projects, whether they are financial or non-financial projects, legitimacy is very important. Legitimacy can come from many sources, but opinion leaders in the community or the adoption and integration of projects, or publicity, are all ways to give a project some legitimacy. Legitimacy will bring more traffic, more trust, and more growth to the project, thus achieving a virtuous circle.
对于web3项目而言，不管是金融类的还是非金融类项目，正统性是非常关键的。正统性可以来自于多方面，但是社区的意见领袖人物或者项目的采用和集成，或者宣传，都是给予项目某种正统性的方式。正统性将会给项目带来更多流量，更多信任，更多增长，从而实现良性循环。
It is quite smart for lens to reserve the lens profile for various web3 projects and brand parties. This is to attract various project parties to use it, and the use of various project parties will bring legitimacy to lens. If mainstream projects use lens, then this orthodoxy is natural.
lens为各种web3项目和品牌方保留lens profile的做法是相当聪明的，这样是吸引各种项目方使用，而各种项目方的使用将会给lens带来正统性，如果主流项目都是用lens，那么这种正统性是自然而然的。