who’s the exit liquidity now 😂
Love seeing all the smart, highly sophisticated crypto KOLs buying the “dumb retail” coins 😂
Ready for $SOCIAL Summer? 🏖🍹🦄
To celebrate, 10 Phaver-Ups and 1M #phairdrop raffled among users who like & share this post or share their own version on X, Lens or Farcaster with instructions below⤵️ Also, L2 can now be reached in 1 day with Anima for faster referral rewards!
How to win 100k Points & a Phaver-Up? 🎉
a) Share & like the $SOCIAL Summer post on X, Lens or Farcaster (each has their own raffle)
b) Make your own post in same channels with $SOCIAL, #phairdrop and your Phaver username/invite code
c) Highest reach in b on X
d) Best meme 🔥
Raffle ends May 31st⏳It’s also time to onboard your frens and earn 1k rewards when they level up with your code: Anima now gives 10 Cred/day and Level 2 limit is dropped to 10C, so new users can level up in 1 day🚀, reward you, and get free Lens & FC to still get a #phairdrop!🤝
Remember that $SOCIAL is not yet available to buy or trade anywhere and anyone requesting you to connect a wallet for airdrop purposes is a scammer.
Stay safe and beware of scam links. Always verify through our official channels. 🫡
" RARITY "
The concept of rarity in art has always been fascinating, and it holds particular significance when considering the very nature of artistic works. Traditionally, a piece of art is often perceived as something unique, a singular piece that embodies the creative expression and individuality of its creator. This is particularly evident in the fields of painting and sculpture, where each work is generally regarded as an original and irreplaceable creation.
However, this perception of uniqueness is starting to be questioned as we explore other forms of artistic expression, such as photography, video, music, and digital art. In these domains, the reproduction and distribution of works can be infinitely easy due to technological advancements. For example, photography allows for the production of multiple copies of the same image, while music can be easily duplicated and distributed on a large scale through online streaming and downloading platforms.
This ease of reproduction challenges the traditional notion of rarity in art. If a work can be easily mass-produced, what value should be attributed to it in terms of rarity and uniqueness? This is a complex question that sparks passionate debates in the contemporary art world.
The emergence of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) has further amplified this discussion. NFTs enable the creation of unique and tamper-proof digital certificates for digital artworks, thereby offering the possibility of attributing a form of rarity and authentic ownership to digital creations. However, even with NFTs, some wonder if the rarity thus created truly compares to that of traditional artworks, given the intangible and reproducible nature of digital media.
The idea of limiting the number of editions of my future digital creations to a maximum of 3 seems to be a thoughtful consideration for preserving rarity and artistic value.
By imposing such a strict limit, I am committed to maintaining a certain level of exclusivity in my work, in my opinion.
I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on the matter, friends. 🙏🫶
Please share your comments below.