Only reward your community (don't do like Avail that tried to reward everyone and got everyone a small amount of tokens), reward based on time active * $ invested, make tiers with the best tier not receiving a enormous amount of tokens, dont ever announce the airdrop or that you are going to have a token, only announce when Snapshot is done, of course don't make points system, protect your airdrop against sybils using ZK-Personhood system, distribute atleast 10% of your tokens to community in TGE, no lockup no vesting. IMO this is the best way to reward your community If your Dapps/ chain is good enough you don't need a season 2 or an airdrop promise, people will use it because they like it and it's good, people haven't stopped using Uniswap because they don't announced a season 2 airdrop for example
0the default answer would be “no” as it is theoretically impossible to satisfy all humans. However, if the question is “Is there an actual way to do an airdrop where most people would be happy?” The answer is “YES”. But it’s a little tricky, as the way to the “YES” isn’t technical but social.
What I mean is that most ppl can be satisfied if the airdrop distribution is marketed properly. Forgive the use of the term “marketing”, it just connotes what I’m talking about here
Most people won’t be satisfied, if an airdrop is technically sound ie distributed well but with poor communications
So I dare say, a successful airdrop distribution is 80% marketing excellence (vibes, communications, engaging community, allowing community update your airdrop distribution a bit) and 20% technical excellence (filtering sybils, measuring contributions, etc)
0I'm very smart , you can send me all tokens , I will distribute to everyone fair and square 😁
0No, you can't. However, I believe that excluding regular users from the airdrop under the pretext of filtering out bots and allocating all tokens to whales and developers is not the appropriate approach for conducting an airdrop.
Normal users also contribute to the project in various ways, so projects should consider them as well. Take, for example, Ethena, Omni, EtherFi, DYM, Altlayer, and Arbitrum; these projects have genuinely served their communities, unlike Starknet, which filtered out most genuine users in the name of bot filtering. Setting a requirement of a balance of 0.005 ETH in their wallets, and they think multiple users cannot maintain it, what a rubbish conditions it is, LOL.
I hope Lensprotocol will prioritize user satisfaction. Yes, You can't make everyone happy, but at least don't kick out real users with dumb rules.
0It’s possible to do an airdrop where everyone who deserves it would be happy
1Yooo, I feel like airdrops are always a mixed bag, right? Like, some people are stoked about free tokens, but others are like "meh." Maybe if they tailored them more to individual interests, it could be a win-win for everyone? Just a thought! 🤔
0not possible to make everyone happy but giving a good sum will make most of them satisfied tier based are better than linear ones
1The fairest way is to have multiple criterias, including early supporters, active users, real users, …
1Only some of us, some of the time. But not all of us, all of the time. That’s just science.
0Hi, Stani
I dont think so. everyone want to earn money. Likely, We ( OGs) want to build our profile for future, to earn our creations.
So I hope, you let OGs out, and dont mark us as spammer.
Thank you. Wishing you and your family good health.
#Lens Summer
26it's near immpossible but at least the happy folks should be x2 than the unhappy users. $UNI And $ARB are the closes protocol to have ever done it. also $JUP on solana did well
1Only way I found it manageable to large groups for NFTs was through voxels
0Nah. You gotta do that sh*t like DB Cooper and just make yourself happy. hey.xyz/u/fxckoxttahere
0That depends on how big your airdrop user base is.If the number of users of zksync is as high as it is, I’m afraid it will be disappointing no matter what you do.
0How could it be possible to make everyone happy considering a percentage of people are never happy, no matter what you do?
2Send me the Airdrop funds, i will distribute it fairly for you.
0even a global universal basic income would have a non trivial group of critics claiming it hinders competition and motivation
2Nop. For everyone to be happy it would be necessary to include a lot of people which would reduce the number allocated per address; which would make those who are desperate for airdrops sad. If we increase the difficulty of obtaining an airdrop, people will cry, and those eligible will have more tokens.
Finnaly, the only people happy would be those who do not farm the airdrop and who receive it without really waiting for it or who wish to invest in the project rather than selling their token.
0Not really. Some people even get mad at earning an airdrop to begin with.
Allocation based on recent activity + extra for OGs would be nice. And kill the bots in the process if possible.
I’ve always said you can’t make everybody happy. It’s like being a president no one is gonna be fully happy with decisions made.
9
