st
Stani@stani·Mar 05

There were some questions back in the days how Lens handles are presented.

Lens Protocol has a built-in concept of Namespaces. Currently there is one canonical namespace /lens

Handle on Lens are presented on the protocol as /lens/punkess

The applications have the full discretion on how to present the handles, most likely you would see /punkess or **@punkess** or puristic approaches /lens/@punkess

Whats the best way to present handle on an app? Leave thoughts below 👇

  • ay
    Aysar@aysargiga·Mar 06

    Simple one @handle

    0
    • cr
      CryptoKing ◱ ◱@jesuslovesyou·Mar 06

      GOOD MORNING @STANY

      1
      • ko
        KochFamily@kochfamily·Mar 06

        Lens pary 🔥🔥🔥

        0
        • de
          Dennise@dennise·Mar 05

          @handle is the easiest to use

          0
          • xy
            Xyori (🟡,🟡)@xyori·Mar 05

            @handle please 😆

            0
            • ed
              Eduard🌹(🟡,🟡)@eduardmsmr·Mar 05

              Just the @handle is the best way imo

              The others overcomplicate things. I think that even now on Orb only the handle is seen, and it is much, much better. It didn’t annoy me before either, but I am sure there were some annoyed by it🌹

              0
              • el
                Elon@elonm·Mar 05

                @handle

                0
                • cp
                  cpoetter@carstenpoetter·Mar 05

                  this is becoming more complicated each day. I'm an old man and can't keep up anymore.
                  does this mean that my handle is /lens/punkess/carstenpoetter? 🤔 that doesn't make sense.

                  did I say that it's complicated? 🤓

                  3
                  • mi
                    Mind Attic@mindattic·Mar 05

                    @handle all the way. Keep it simple. Web2 aps now have names, handle.... Too much

                    2
                    • de
                      Deven Rathod@rathod·Mar 05

                      I think we are the only one who highlights the handle without any prefix, is this a plus I wonder ..?

                      Comment by @rathod
                      2
                      • ti
                        TiTi888@titi888·Mar 05

                        不错

                        0
                        • ra
                          Random Potential (🟡,🟡)@potential·Mar 05

                          @[handle] is deffinitely the way, at least for now. Additional names paces will give more freedom to apps when they decide to create walled gardens, while simplicity is currently the key.

                          As a best practice, app specific namespaces should be used and recognised only withing that app. Thus, @[handle] would represent .lens namespace universally, while @[handle].[app] would be recognised only in that app's closed garden. Otherwise, any app would have to actively recognize and render all other namespaces, not all apps would act the same, and it would soon be a mess similar to one we now have will groups (which we are about to solve).

                          Not app specific namespaces is a different topic thou.

                          Wdyt?

                          4
                          • tr
                            Trust Me Bro@trustmebro·Mar 05

                            Why complicate? @+handle and would be seen as the name the people choose for their profile.

                            For instance (the other way around) Orb for me now shows the handles, not the profile names and some ppl I don’t their handles, but their profile names.

                            1
                            • yu
                              Yuki@yukifren13·Mar 05

                              @yukifren13 classic and easy

                              0
                              • me
                                Melike@melikebarut·Mar 05

                                just @ is the best way imo

                                3
                                • al
                                  Ali@riddler·Mar 05

                                  @riddler is the best way possible!

                                  3
                                  • di
                                    disruptor@disruptor·Mar 05

                                    disruptor.lens like disruptor.eth

                                    0
                                    • bl
                                      Black Joker ( 🟡,🟡)@blackjoker·Mar 05

                                      @blackjoker is too native and has been because we are uses to this.

                                      Preferably I think everyone has different opinions for this I would like to see my name as *blackjoker

                                      0
                                      • py
                                        pyta@razama·Mar 05

                                        I think @punkess more readeable sir

                                        2
                                        • 0x
                                          0xql@0x-ql·Mar 05

                                          @ is GOAT

                                          3