In like 3 days $MIGGLES hit similar market cap to $DEGEN which took absolutely ages.

Whilst lens got $BONSAI that is moving so slow.

Is patience a virtue or we on wrong chain?

Maybe it's a culture thing?

Or does the team need to pull out millions and send pointless and $BONSAI to the moon so we can all make 6-7 figs and tell our stories online about how we made bank on lens.

I don't see no stories on social about anyone making life-changing wealth on @lens as of today.

I see plenty of life changing stories from coins like $DEGEN and $DOGINME. Tbh I could name a handful coming from Farcaster.

It's got to be the community its got to be culture it's got to be chain.

I ain't put my finger on anything else..

  • Mesut@mesutgulecen·Jul 21

    Farcaster people are crypto-native individuals from the Ethereum community. Lens people are creators and are not as aligned with crypto investing as Farcaster people, which is why their capital is smaller.

    On the other hand, Polygon is not the right chain. There is no meme culture here. Base has a big hype and volume for new projects, evident from the success of meme tokens, social apps, and consumer projects on Base.

    Therefore, we need to onboard crypto people to Lens and Bonsai. Before doing that, we need to shift to a better ecosystem, as Polygon is not enough for this. I hope Lens Network will change the game if they can bring capital and crypto people from other chains.

    5
    • GRAMS@grams·Jul 21

      don't get me started

      2
      • The Wizard King@zkjew·Jul 21

        If you want my honest answer, I’d say it’s bc the amount of engaged users and users with capital are on farcaster rather then Lens. I think this will change once people actually look at the differences between the two and I think farcaster is risking long term gains for short term gains. However, I think you should also add that the average Farcaster user is 10-100x richer then the average lens user.

        6